Maybe you lot out there know this:
But it was new to me (mind you, I am rather lackadaisical re: 'the evidence').
So - the pen IS original?
I must admit - having now seen the engraving next to the actual monument - and knowing engravers managed to get things wrong not irregularly - I'm back to pen as evidence (until one of you corrects me again).
Greer had a couple of interesting things to suggest re: the monument too - not least, the body wouldn't fit in the grave space in the church.
The administrator has disabled public write access.